Pursuant to Article Third, the arbitrating companies must notify AF of a clerical or jurisdictional error via AF’s website within 30 calendar days after the decision’s publication date. The determination as to whether an actual error was made is at AF’s sole discretion and is not subject to further review, appeal, or inquiry. AF may also find and correct clerical or jurisdictional errors without notice from the arbitrating companies within 30 calendar days after publication of the decision.
Below are examples of clerical and jurisdictional errors:
Clerical Error – A mistake made by AF staff or the arbitrator(s). Examples of AF staff error include not providing proper notice of filing or not assigning a requested three-person panel.
Correctable Arbitrator Errors
- Mathematical errors
- Switching the parties when recording the liability decision
- Referencing the lack of evidence that was listed in the filing
- Applying a state regulation or statute from a state other than the loss state
- Misapplying an AF Rule or procedure
When there is a policy limits issue or a coverage of denial that was not raised in the filing, members have 60 days from the date of the published decision to raise and support it.
A copy of the denial of coverage letter to the party (insured) seeking coverage for the loss or proof of policy limits must accompany the inquiry or no action can be taken.
When an award exceeds policy limits, the filing company will have the option to accept the policy limits as final settlement and forego recovery of the claim against the insured directly or have the decision voided to pursue alternative means of full recovery.
(a) Filing company made its filing at least 120 calendar days before the statute of limitations expires; and
(b) Responding company pleads its defense at least 60 calendar days before the statute of limitations expires.
When not to submit a Post-Decision Inquiry (PDI):
- Disagreeing with the decision regarding liability or damages.
- The arbitrator did not comment on specific evidence.
- Wanting further explanation.
- Disagreeing with a decision based on the belief that the arbitrator misunderstood the facts or misread the evidence.
- Failing to submit specific evidence or attaching the evidence to the wrong location (i.e., Counter Claim Response section).
- Failing to raise an exclusion in the filing other than policy limits or denial of coverage.
- Not raising Prior Payments in the Prior Payment field. Prior Payments not supporting cashed, cleared, or paid at the time of evidence submission/filing.