- Sharing information with arbitrators on recent decision quality trends and drivers
- Answering questions arbitrators may have on hearing cases
Key takeaways from this workshop include the following:
- Consider the preponderance of evidence standard before rendering a “word versus word” decision. The parties’ respective liability arguments may convey a word versus word scenario, but the evidence may reveal which version is more probable.
- Evidence is considered valid unless refuted by other evidence. For example, a driver statement submitted by a party does not need to be corroborated by a police report or witness statement.
- When hearing a case involving policy limits and additional exposures, remember that:
- Valid Exposures include: damages to an uninsured party; party not named in the filing; party named, but not seeking its own damages in the filing; damages to property (guardrail, traffic light/sign)
- Not Valid Expenses include: damages sought in the filing; damages not supported by evidence
- Out-of-pocket expenses could be valid or not valid. For example, if the Recovering party’s insured has sent a demand for their out-of-pocket expenses, that would be a valid exposure since it impacts the available balance of the policy limits.
- Tips for hearing damage disputes include the following:
- Avoid using template text. Seeing the same explanation on different cases conveys the perception that individual cases are not being heard on their own merit.
- Address all arguments made.
- Craft your explanation to the party that did not prevail and why their argument was not supported.
- Remember, you are not adjusting the claim. As the arbitrator, you are resolving the parties’ dispute based on their arguments and evidence.